@Timo Walther <twalt...@confluent.io> @Yanquan Lv @Jim Hughes
<jhug...@confluent.io> Thank you for saying that the FLIP looks good.

@Feng Jin, +1 to what Timo already said above, does that address your
concern?

This FLIP seems to pretty uncontroversial so far so perhaps we can start a
vote soon?  Maybe tomorrow before the 4th of July holiday.

On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 12:25 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Natea,
>
> the FLIPs looks good to me. Looking for forward to it.
>
> @Feng: TypeInferenceUtil#generateSignature considers parameter names if
> they have been specified. We can further evolve this function (e.g.
> improving the result type information), but this is not part of the
> FLIP. This requires changes in the TypeStrategy interface.
>
> Regards,
> Timo
>
> On 30.06.24 10:18, Feng Jin wrote:
> > Hi, Natea,
> >
> >
> > Thank you for initiating this FLIP.
> >
> > Have you considered displaying parameter names? This would make it easier
> > for users to use named parameters.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Feng
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 3:49 PM Yanquan Lv <decq12y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Natea. This FLIP looks good from my side.
> >> I also look forward to showing the return type, as well as auxiliary
> >> information such as comments or usage, although the current
> implementation
> >> does not include this part.
> >>
> >>
> >> Natea Eshetu Beshada <nbesh...@confluent.io.invalid> 于2024年6月26日周三
> >> 03:01写道:
> >>
> >>> Oh no haha, yes thanks for pointing that out Jim! Of course I make a
> typo
> >>> on an editable format like email :)
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:20 AM Jim Hughes
> <jhug...@confluent.io.invalid
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Natea,
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks good.  As a note, in the title of this email, a number got
> >>> switched!
> >>>> FLIP-456 is about compiled plans for batch operators. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> The link below is correct.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:29 PM Natea Eshetu Beshada
> >>>> <nbesh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to kickstart the discussion of FLIP-465: Introduce
> >>> DESCRIBE
> >>>>> FUNCTION [1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The proposal is to add SQL syntax that would allow users to describe
> >>> the
> >>>>> metadata of a given function.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I look forward to hearing feedback from the community.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-465%3A+Introduce+DESCRIBE+FUNCTION
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Natea
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to