WebLog here:
https://github.com/ktzoumas/incubator-flink/tree/webloganalysis-example-scala
Do you need any more done?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I added the ConnectedComponents Example from Vasia.
>
> Keep 'em coming, people. :D
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Alright, will do.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > 2014-09-08 17:48 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
> >
> >> Ok people, executive decision. :D
> >>
> >> Please look at KMeansData.java and KMeans.scala. I'm storing the data
> >> in multi-dimensional object arrays and then converting it to the
> >> required Java or Scala objects.
> >>
> >> Also, I changed isEqualTo to equalTo to make it consistent with the Java
> >> API.
> >>
> >> Regarding Join (and coGroup). There is no need for a keyword, you can
> >> just write:
> >>
> >> left.join(right).where(0).equalTo(1) { (le, re) => new MyResult(le, re)
> }
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Aside from the DataSet issue, I also found an inconsistency with the
> Java
> >> > API. In Java join is done as:
> >> >
> >> > ds1.join(ds2).where(...).equalTo(...)
> >> >
> >> > where in the current Scala this is:
> >> >
> >> > ds1.join(d2).where(...).isEqualTo(...)
> >> >
> >> > isEqualTo() should be renamed to equalTo(), IMO.
> >> > Also, join (+cross and coGroup?) lacks the with() method because
> "with"
> >> is
> >> > a keyword in Scala. Should be offer something similar for Scala or go
> >> with
> >> > map() on Tuple2(left, right)?
> >> >
> >> > 2014-09-08 13:51 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>:
> >> >
> >> >> Instead of Strings, Object[][] would work as well. That is a generic
> >> >> representation of a Tuple.
> >> >>
> >> >> Alternatively, they could be stored as Java or Scala Tuples, with a
> >> generic
> >> >> utility method to convert between the two.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Yeah, I ran into the same problem...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +1 for using Strings and parsing them, but using the CSVFormat
> won't
> >> >> work
> >> >> > because this is based on a FileInputFormat.
> >> >> > So we would need to parse the Strings manually...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2014-09-08 10:35 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Hi,
> >> >> > > on second thought. Maybe we should just change all the example
> input
> >> >> > > data to strings and use CSV input formats in all the examples.
> What
> >> do
> >> >> > > you think?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Cheers,
> >> >> > > Aljoscha
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >> aljos...@apache.org>
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >> > > > yes it's unfortunate that the data types are incompatible. I'm
> >> afraid
> >> >> > > > you have to to what you proposed: move the data to a static
> field
> >> and
> >> >> > > > convert it in the getDefaultEdgeDataSet() method in Scala. It's
> >> not
> >> >> > > > nice, but copying would duplicate the data and make it easier
> for
> >> it
> >> >> > > > to go out of sync in the Java and Scala versions.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > What do the others think? This will probably occur in all the
> >> >> examples.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> >> > > > Aljoscha
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> >> >> > > > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > >> Hey,
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> I have ported the Connected Components example, but I am not
> sure
> >> >> how
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > > >> reuse the example input data from java-examples.
> >> >> > > >> In the ConnectedComponentsData class, the vertices and edges
> data
> >> >> are
> >> >> > > >> produced by the methods getDefaultVertexDataSet()
> >> >> > > >> and getDefaultEdgeDataSet(), which take
> >> >> > > >> an org.apache.flink.api.java.ExecutionEnvironment as
> parameter.
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> One way is to provide public static fields (like in the
> >> >> WordCountData
> >> >> > > >> class), but this introduces a conversion
> >> >> > > >> from org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple2 to Scala tuple and
> >> from
> >> >> > > >> java.lang.Long to scala.Long and I guess this is an
> unnecessary
> >> >> > > complexity
> >> >> > > >> for an example (?).
> >> >> > > >> Another way is, of course, to copy the example data in the
> Scala
> >> >> > > example.
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> Am I missing something here?
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> Thanks!
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> Cheers,
> >> >> > > >> V.
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >> On 5 September 2014 15:52, Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljos...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > > >>
> >> >> > > >>> Alright, I updated my repo:
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> https://github.com/aljoscha/incubator-flink/commits/scala-rework
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> This now has a working WordCount example. It's pretty much a
> >> copy
> >> >> of
> >> >> > > >>> the Java example with some fixups for the syntax and lambda
> >> >> > functions.
> >> >> > > >>> You'll also notice that I added the java-examples as a
> >> dependency
> >> >> for
> >> >> > > >>> the scala-examples. I did this to reuse the example input
> data.
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> When you ported a program you can do a pull request against
> my
> >> repo
> >> >> > > >>> and I will collect the examples.
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> Happy coding. :D
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > > >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Hermann Gábor <
> >> >> reckone...@gmail.com
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> > +1
> >> >> > > >>> >
> >> >> > > >>> > ComputeEdgeDegrees for me!
> >> >> > > >>> >
> >> >> > > >>> >
> >> >> > > >>> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Márton Balassi <
> >> >> > > >>> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > >>> > wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> +1
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> BatchGradientDescent for me :)
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Kostas Tzoumas <
> >> >> > > ktzou...@apache.org>
> >> >> > > >>> >> wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > +1
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > I go for WebLogAnalysis.
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > My experience with Scala consists of going through a
> >> tutorial
> >> >> so
> >> >> > > this
> >> >> > > >>> >> will
> >> >> > > >>> >> > be a good stress test both for me and the new API :-)
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> >> >> > > >>> >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > +1 for having other people implement the examples!
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > Connected Components and Kmeans for me :)
> >> >> > > >>> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > -V.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > On 4 September 2014 21:03, Fabian Hueske <
> >> >> fhue...@apache.org>
> >> >> > > >>> wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > I go for TriangleEnumeration and PageRank.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > Let's also do the examples similar to the Java
> >> examples:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - running out-of-the-box without parameters
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - parameters for external data
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - follow a similar code structure
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > 2014-09-04 20:56 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <
> >> >> > > aljos...@apache.org
> >> >> > > >>> >:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > Will do, then people can reserve their favourite
> >> >> examples
> >> >> > > here.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Fabian Hueske <
> >> >> > > >>> fhue...@apache.org>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > wrote:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > I think having examples implemented by different
> >> >> people
> >> >> > > >>> proved to
> >> >> > > >>> >> > be
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > valuable in the past.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > I'd help with two or three examples.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > It might be helpful if you'd port a simple first
> >> one
> >> >> > such
> >> >> > > as
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > WordCount.
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > Fabian
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > 2014-09-04 18:47 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <
> >> >> > > >>> aljos...@apache.org
> >> >> > > >>> >> >:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Hi,
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> I have a working rewrite of the Scala API here:
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >>
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> https://github.com/aljoscha/incubator-flink/commits/scala-rework
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> I'm hoping that I'll only have to write the
> tests
> >> and
> >> >> > > port
> >> >> > > >>> the
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> examples. Do you think it makes sense to let
> other
> >> >> > people
> >> >> > > >>> port
> >> >> > > >>> >> the
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> examples, so that someone else uses it and
> maybe
> >> >> > notices
> >> >> > > some
> >> >> > > >>> >> > quirks
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> in the API?
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Cheers,
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Aljoscha
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >>
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> > >
> >> >> > > >>> >> >
> >> >> > > >>> >>
> >> >> > > >>>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
>
