Sorry I totally forgot to check the streaming API. Do they use the getXXXReturnTypes() methods of the TypeExtractor?
> Am 16.12.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>: > > I've worked on adding Kryo support to Flink today. I would really like to > include this into the release. Many users were complaining about this ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-610). > > I've based my work on top of Timo's pull request. If we're not going to > merge it, I will have to rebase my code to the current master. ... I'll try > and see if its easily doable. > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Yes, one thing I just realized is that the streaming API is not aware of >> MissingTypeInfos and it may cause weird behavior. >> >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for stability first >>> >>> 2014-12-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> I am currently working through the type hints pull request... >>>> >>>> Right now, I actually think that we should postpone this for the next >>>> bugfix release. >>>> >>>> This pull request changes actually some tricky mechanisms in the Java >> API >>>> (it delays the type information), which may have implications that me >> and >>>> Timo have not fully caught now. >>>> >>>> I don't feel Merging this last minute - this is prone to introduce >>> errors. >>>> >>>> Any opinions on that? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for adding the closure cleaner... >>>>> Am 16.12.2014 15:23 schrieb "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljos...@apache.org >>> : >>>>> >>>>> Do we want the Java Closure Cleaner in 0.8 as well? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Márton Balassi >>>>>> <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Cool, thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The type hints PR is ready now, Timo made some final adjustments >>>>>> yesterday >>>>>>>> evening. I'll review and merge it now, then we can fork the >> branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Márton Balassi < >>>>>> balassi.mar...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Checking the PRs listed by Stephan it seems every import one >> has >>>> been >>>>>>>>> merged. As for the optional ones the following two are still >>>> pending: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Add support for Subclasses, Interfaces, Abstract Classes as >> POJOs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1245] Introduce TypeHints for Java API operators >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Robert +1'd the TypeHints PR and Timo has just updated it. >> Should >>>> we >>>>>> wait >>>>>>>>> for it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Marton >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Stephan Ewen < >>> se...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> Important Pull Requests to merge: >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1287] LocalizableSplitAssigner prefers splits with >>> less >>>>>>>> degrees >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-1305] [FLINK-1304] Test for HadoopInputWrapper and >>>>>>>> NullWritable >>>>>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Upgraded HBase addon to HBase 0.98.x and new Tuple APIs + >> fix >>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> ExecutionEnvironment >>>>>>>>>>> (this is partially merged, there are a few POM entries >>> missing >>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> Hadoop 1 >>>>>>>>>>> support) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The first two PRs are still open. I will have a look at them >> as >>>>>> well >>>>>>>>>> (Robert already tested one). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Robert: >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the Hbase PR: Is it resolved by 1b69749 ("Enable >>>>>> flink-hbase >>>>>>>>>> module for hadoop1 build as well")? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if had a look at the remaining important >> ones >>>>>> today. >>>>>>>> :-) >>
