+1. 

* Source artifact builds correctly.
* Checksums of both artifacts are accurate.
* NOTICE, LICENSE look accurate.
* CHANGELOG, RELEASE-NOTES, DEVNOTES and README exist, look ok.
* Ran agent from binary artifact - looks good.

Thanks for doing this Mike. Great work!


Thanks
Hari

-- 
Hari Shreedharan


On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> +0
> 
> The bin distribution has a proper notice and license and seems to be properly 
> signed. I still have no idea why it contains the source since that is present 
> in the source jar, speaking of which it is also properly signed and contains 
> the proper notice and license.
> 
> I cannot verify the maven artifacts since they have not been published to the 
> staging repository. For example, I'm not sure if the Flume build generates 
> the sources jar for each sub-project, which is what IDE's would like to have 
> along with the "normal" jar.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Mike Percy wrote:
> 
> > This is the first release for Apache Flume as a top-level project,
> > version 1.2.0. We are voting on release candidate rc1.
> > 
> > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
> > 
> > The list of fixed issues:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/tags/flume-1.2.0-rc1/CHANGELOG
> > 
> > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1)
> > for the source and binary artifacts can be found at:
> > https://people.apache.org/~mpercy/flume/apache-flume-1.2.0-rc1/
> > 
> > The tag to be voted on:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/tags/flume-1.2.0-rc1
> > 
> > The KEYS file can be found here:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flume/dist/KEYS
> > 
> > Changes since rc0:
> > - Updated LICENSE file
> > - Updated DEVNOTES file
> > - Removed DISCLAIMER file from dist.xml and src.xml manifests
> > - pom.xml file updated with TLP info (FLUME-1359)
> > - A build fix to prevent multiple servlet-api jars in lib dir
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to