Thank you sir, I appreciate your effort. As I mentioned originally, I do not consider either of those as a blocker - you've already got my +1 :-)
Jarcec On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:34:55AM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org>wrote: > > > 1) Both tar.gz archives contain same folder. Would be nice if the folder > > would be the same as the archive name minus the suffix. E.g. so that > > archive apache-flume-1.2.0-bin.tar.gz would contain directory > > apache-flume-1.2.0-bin instead of apache-flume-1.2.0. > > > > I looked into changing the build to generate files with this layout, > however I didn't see an easy way with the current setup. I punted on this > to reduce the number of manual steps involved in a release and therefore > reduce the likelihood of making a mistake. > > 2) LICENSE file is the some for both source and binary distribution. As a > > result the source distribution contain license notes to jars that are no > > part of the source release. It's little bit confusing. > > > > I added the following text to the LICENSE file in order to indicate when > the licenses apply, and I checked the changes into trunk to reduce the > manual steps required of the RM during a release: > > "The *compiled* Apache Flume distribution includes the following > sources/binaries. The use of these sources/binaries is subject to the terms > and conditions of their respective licenses." (my emphasis) > > Regards, > Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
