I don't have a strong preference, as long as it works with Review Board I'm fine with doing whatever.
Regards Mike On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brock Noland <[email protected]> wrote: > Traditionally as a project we have generated patches with --no-prefix. > As Mike said on ReviewBoard: > > "--no-prefix used to be required to generate a patch that was > compatible with both Subversion and Git, but since we have switched > over to using only Git it should not be necessary anymore. Still, I've > regenerated the patch with --no-prefix." > > As a project should we switch over to the default git prefix? I am > fine with the current scenario or using a prefix, I'd just like us to > be consistent. > > Brock >
