I have similar opinion that I do not much care. However I tent to not use --no-prefix as it means less typing for me. But I'm good with both options.
Jarcec On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:34:20PM -0700, Mike Percy wrote: > I don't have a strong preference, as long as it works with Review Board I'm > fine with doing whatever. > > Regards > Mike > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brock Noland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Traditionally as a project we have generated patches with --no-prefix. > > As Mike said on ReviewBoard: > > > > "--no-prefix used to be required to generate a patch that was > > compatible with both Subversion and Git, but since we have switched > > over to using only Git it should not be necessary anymore. Still, I've > > regenerated the patch with --no-prefix." > > > > As a project should we switch over to the default git prefix? I am > > fine with the current scenario or using a prefix, I'd just like us to > > be consistent. > > > > Brock > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
