FWIW, missing the train wouldn’t be that big a deal if you knew the next release wouldn’t be too far out. A release a quarter would be a nice target.
Ralph > On Sep 30, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Denes Arvay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What are your plans regarding to the mentioned 18 issues in patch available >> state? Should we decide on a one-by-one basis whether we'd like to include >> in the release or should we reschedule all of them to a next release? >> > > I'd personally recommend committing whatever is ready and reasonably > low-risk, and whatever doesn't make the deadline should "miss the train" > unless it's a particularly critical issue. This approach has worked well > for me in the past. > > Best, > Mike
