I should add that while I made one change that I needed to get the flume 
configuration from a Spring Cloud Configuration Server I have no plans for any 
other major changes.

Ralph

> On Jan 13, 2022, at 2:23 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> Tristan, I am in the process of updating dependencies and applying patches 
> in prep for a 1.10 release. I hope to have that ready to go within the next 
> week.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Jan 13, 2022, at 12:31 AM, Tristan Stevens <tris...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I can confirm from Cloudera’s perspective that Kite is abandoned.
>> 
>> +1 to removing and I think we’re heading towards a Flume 2.0 at this point. 
>> We can then take things like log4j2, Hive3, Hadoop 3, etc.
>> 
>> Tristan
>> 
>> 
>> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> Reply: dev@flume.apache.org <dev@flume.apache.org>
>> Date: 12 January 2022 at 17:22:14
>> To: dev@flume.apache.org <dev@flume.apache.org>
>> Subject:  Re: Flume release that includes the log4j patches.  
>> 
>> Given that the Kite Dataset Sink is documented as being experimental and 
>> since Kite appears to have been abandoned I am making the decisions to 
>> remove the Kite Dataset Sink from Flume.  
>> 
>> Ralph  
>> 
>>>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 9:14 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>>>> wrote:  
>>> 
>>> I am working on exactly that. But there are quite a few dependencies that 
>>> need to be updated besides Log4j. That update was pretty easy.  
>>> 
>>> I am currently trying to update the Avro dependency as it also has security 
>>> issues. Unfortunately, Avro’s upgrade is not completely binary compatible, 
>>> which is causing an error in the kite-sdk, which appears to be an another 
>>> Cloudera abandoned project.  
>>> 
>>> In short, Apache Flume really needs more people to become active in the 
>>> project.  
>>> 
>>> Ralph  
>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 12, 2022, at 6:30 AM, Justin Holmes <jus...@nascency.co.uk> wrote: 
>>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Can we have a release that includes the fixed log4j vulnerabilities soon?  
>>>> 
>>>> --  
>>>> Justin Holmes  
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to