Okay, I think all the repos are updated to reflect the new branch name now. Thanks to Mike Miller who helped review the PRs for those, so they could be wrapped up quickly.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > The site is now published from the new automated staging process. Much > less complicated to publish from the markdown now. :) > Instructions in https://github.com/apache/fluo-website#publishing , if > you aren't already familiar. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 4:29 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > INFRA has completed their part. I have an open PR to update the links > > on the website now and to configure our automated site staging: > > https://github.com/apache/fluo-website/pull/195 > > After it is merged, I will need to verify the staged site build and do > > some one-time steps to publish it. > > > > I have not yet looked at the docs for the other repos, but can > > probably expect that some residual references to 'master' branches > > exist in those that I can do PRs for soon. Maybe next week. > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:54 AM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > For reference, here's the INFRA ticket: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20671 > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:39 AM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Okay, since there are no objections, I will proceed with implementing > > > > the default branch changes first, and then will work on the updates to > > > > the website build process. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Arvind Shyamsundar > > > > <arvin...@microsoft.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > > > >> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 1:12 PM > > > >> To: dev@fluo.apache.org > > > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [LAZY][VOTE] Branch renames and automated site > > > >> build from 'main' branch > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:07 AM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > We should use 'main' for our default branch in all of our Fluo repos > > > >> > (including the 'fluo-website' repo, which currently uses 'gh-pages'). > > > >> > Any content in 'master' branches should be moved into 'main' branches > > > >> > instead. > > > >> > > > > >> > Additionally, for the 'fluo-website' repo, I'd like to configure it > > > >> > for automatic staging to an `asf-staging` branch by leveraging ASF > > > >> > INFRA's .asf.yaml features out of the new default 'main' branch, from > > > >> > which we can publish by moving commits to `asf-site` with a simple > > > >> > git > > > >> > one-liner. We have been doing this for some time now in the Apache > > > >> > Accumulo project, and it is working out nicely, so I want to bring it > > > >> > here also. If you have questions about how that works, please refer > > > >> > to: > > > >> > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > > > >> > ub.com%2Fapache%2Faccumulo-website%2Fblob%2Fmain%2FREADME.md%23publish > > > >> > ing&data=02%7C01%7Carvindsh%40microsoft.com%7C23ce0ef1a25d405f8fee > > > >> > 08d83d69a750%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637326871681 > > > >> > 121000&sdata=TatMntzKeb3hw91RjJacYnxQQYrlVpr3cehzQdsjerI%3D&re > > > >> > served=0 > > > >> > (or ask me) > > > >> > > > > >> > This is a lazy vote, so it will pass unless there are any objections > > > >> > raised, in which case, it becomes a majority vote. If there is a -1 > > > >> > for the website build part only, but not for the branch rename, then > > > >> > this vote will proceed on the branch renames only, and we will > > > >> > discuss > > > >> > the website build separately. > > > >> > > > > >> > I'm happy to start working on these once the vote passes. > > > >> > > > > >> > This vote will end after Tue 11 Aug 2020 09:30:00 AM UTC (Tue 11 Aug > > > >> > 2020 05:30:00 AM EDT / Tue 11 Aug 2020 02:30:00 AM PDT) > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Christopher > > > >> >
