David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:

David Crossley wrote:

What i am proposing now is an extra step. Remove the option
"HEAD version" entirely from Jira. I think it is superfluous.

Sorry - I'm reading too fast this morning.

If a bug is introduced into head (i.e. wasn't in the previous release)
where would it go? The next release due I suppose.

Seems fine to me.


Yes, that is what i meant.


Would it be worth naming the next release 0.8-dev and then renaming to
0.8 when it is released? (not sure if Jira allows this, I assume it does).


Yes, that avoids all confusion. Good idea.

I just tested by moving 0.7 to 0.7-dev ... hooray.

I will do that over the weekend unless someone stops me.

--David


+1 Good ideas, guys.

--
Dave Brondsema : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.splike.com : programming
http://csx.calvin.edu : student org
http://www.brondsema.net : personal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



Reply via email to