Mark Eggers wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > I'll try svn diff for my next submission (making faqs v2.0 consistent > > > with document v2.0 and howto v2.0 I think). > > > > Hmm, i am not clear what you mean by that. > > I noticed that there are only head definitions for howto and document > DTDs. When authoring other documents, you can't put some of the > information in. After looking at the other DTDs, I don't know if it > would be valuable to add the head elements in or not. > > > That is correct. These stylesheets need to be able > > to cope with both formats. Your changes did. > > Actually, I think in my copy I broke v 1.x How To compatibility. At > least with my sample document the questions and answers were not > translated correctly. That's why I left the original stylesheet.
Todays trunk works for me. In SVN we have howto/howto-howto.xml which uses <faqs> ... this doc was DTD v1.3 but now i upgraded it to to be DTD v2.0 ... and both versions work in my local test. If you still see problems, then please add a test document to a Jira Issue. > > The basic thing to bear in mind is that all formats > > (i.e. v*.* of faq, changes, document) get transformed > > into the internal format. At the momemnt this is document-v1 > > I see that. I've been trying to get the meta element from v 2.0 DTDs to > make it into the final rendition. Right now if you add a meta tag to a > v 2.0 how to or document xml file you will get non-validating html from > the pelt skin. Even if you don't include a meta tag, you get an empty > <meta></meta> element in the output and the html no longer validates. > > Hopefully I can get that figured out. That would be a great relief. It has been on my todo list for the imminent 0.7 release. The empty <meta-data/> element would mean we need to change our compliance.html page. --David