>> ATM I am only concerned about making Forrest >> genuinely useful as a live server, which IMO is a blocker for any >> serious request to infra.
Are you saying Forrest is not up to performing as a serious live server right now? If I understood that right, why would that be the case? Regards, Torsten > David Crossley wrote: >> Torsten Schlabach wrote: >> >>>Nicola, >>> >>>>My goal is to put a live Forrest on ASF infrastructure instead of the >>>>bot and have that serve all Forrest-based sites in Apache, comprising >>>>Lenya. >>> >>>Sounds good. Let me know if you need any help or input from us. >>> >>>Are you subsribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is a rush for >>>Solaris zones on the new v40z machine. Hurry up if you need one. > > I am not subscribed to infra and, given my time constraints, will not be > in the near future. ATM I am only concerned about making Forrest > genuinely useful as a live server, which IMO is a blocker for any > serious request to infra. > >> That is not true. Justin at Infrastructure was asking for a few >> projects to help test the initial setup. Yes there was a rush! >> However, there is no need to rush. Each PMC is to eventually have >> a zone. > > This is very nice :-) > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
