Re: Defining Views Terminology

[Ross Gardler]

Ross Gardler wrote:

We should also remember our Forrest 1.0 Working Draft which addresses 
this issue from an implementation independant perspective

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/TR/2004/WD-forrest10.html 



Hmmm... I was just reviewing this document. It seems it is no longer 
implementation independant since it talks about forrest:views and 
templates etc. I should have picked up on this when the original changes 
were made, but I didn't,

We need to revisit this document (in the context of this thread) and 
remove all implementation specific details.

Ross