-----Original Message----- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 27 March 2006 4:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: active committers (Was: [RT] structurer location and resource types)
Tim Williams wrote: > On 3/24/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > To keep it objective, we should add some criteria (see below). ... > 1) Add to the "who" page that folks listed as "Active Committers" are > those committers who have contributed (code, docs, community) in the > last 12 months. They are automatically moved to the "Inactive > Committers" list based on that criteria. They are, however, welcome > to return to active duty at any time and should reannounce themselves > by committing a change listing them as active. > > 2) Whoever cares about this should periodically review contributions > and under the same lazy approval of every other code change [and based > on the 12 month rule], should change/committ who.xml - the committer > in question will correct you if you're wrong. I've not checked our existing guidelines, but assuming there are none that cover this yet... +1 Ross Sounds good to me. +1 Gav... -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.2/293 - Release Date: 26/03/2006
