Gav.... wrote: > > From: Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > > > > > >>> <forrest:contract name="siteinfo-copyright"> > > >>> <forrest:property name="siteinfo-copyright"> > > >>> <copyright> > > >>> - <year inception="true">2002</year> > > >>> + <year inception="true">2007</year> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> No, inception year of Acme Software Organisation is still 2002. > > >> The actual year 2007 will be automatically calculated... > > > > > > I realise how inception and current date work, I was just bringing it > > upto > > > Date for the example. 'Acme' is a generic that anyone is allowed to use, > > > There is no inception date as such - Acme has been in cartoons etc since > > the > > > Early 20's. Clicking on the link to acme.org/licenses/ will take you to > > some > > > Random place at the moment you can buy cheap travel there.
Then we should point to somewhere that completely breaks and isn't likely to become squatted. How about: myacmeorgfao.org > > > If it really makes that much of a difference, I'll put it back. > > > > Ok sorry for the noise... > > Don't be sorry, I could be entirely wrong, it's just my interpretation. I am > Fully open to being corrected on any commits I make without regarding them > As being criticism. (and I often am corrected :) ) That's the spirit. I think that Cyriaque was right. If you make it 2007 then it prevents the demonstration of the automatic ability to generate the date-range. Also if we keep updating that example, then it becomes a maintenance task. -David
