> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gav... [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2007 9:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r514362 - in
> /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.themes.core/theme
> s/pelt: css/pelt.screen.css html/pelt-html.vt.xml images/Thumbs.db
> images/chapter.gif images/chapter_open.gif
>
>
> <quote who="Brian M Dube">
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >> Gav.... wrote:
> >>>> From: Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
> >>>>>>> <forrest:contract name="siteinfo-copyright">
> >>>>>>> <forrest:property name="siteinfo-copyright">
> >>>>>>> <copyright>
> >>>>>>> - <year inception="true">2002</year>
> >>>>>>> + <year inception="true">2007</year>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, inception year of Acme Software Organisation is still 2002.
> >>>>>> The actual year 2007 will be automatically calculated...
> >>>>> I realise how inception and current date work, I was just bringing
> it
> >>>> upto
> >>>>> Date for the example. 'Acme' is a generic that anyone is allowed to
> >>>>> use,
> >>>>> There is no inception date as such - Acme has been in cartoons etc
> >>>>> since
> >>>> the
> >>>>> Early 20's. Clicking on the link to acme.org/licenses/ will take you
> >>>>> to
> >>>> some
> >>>>> Random place at the moment you can buy cheap travel there.
> >>
> >> Then we should point to somewhere that completely breaks
> >> and isn't likely to become squatted. How about: myacmeorgfao.org
> >
> > Why not use one of the domains [1] created for testing and
> > documentation? They are reserved and cannot become squatted.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt
> > example.com, example.net, example.org
> >
>
> I think that's a good idea Brian, thanks.
>
> --
> Gav...
And before I commit, I'll put it back to 2002, for the other info:-
<copyright>
<year inception="true">2002</year>
<vendor>An Example Organisation.</vendor>
<copyright-link>http://www.example.org/</copyright-link>
</copyright>
Is that ok, the page exists with a default test message
Or for copyright we could have
<copyright-link>http://www.example.org/license</copyright-link>
Or
<copyright-link>http://www.example.org/copyright</copyright-link>
And are guaranteed to give a 404.
What is the preferred outcome?
Gav...
