Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley commented on FOR-1066: > > ------------------------------------- > > > > Hmm, that will hide it and so people tend not to bother to investigate. > > Actually I am using the dispatcher in a very big project and need to > enhance the response time over the next couple of weeks. You may have > seen some commits about clean up to the cocoon-2.2 block.
However, i gather that this is not yet used in the dispatcher-enabled forrest seed site, where we are seeing the memory issues. > > Hey i saw that input modules are involved in the error trace. I wonder if > > FOR-591 and FOR-1060 are relevant. > > Need to have a look into this issues and the stack. My project will be > online next week I will need to find time to have a look. Ralph Goers recently did a lot of work at Cocoon to fix the input modules memory issues and instead created a more versatile system. See FOR-1060. Could Forrest use that independently or do we need the rest of Forrest core to be upgraded to use the current Cocoon 2.2 ? -David
