On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 02:20 +1100, David Crossley wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > David Crossley wrote: > > > > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > > > > David Crossley commented on FOR-1066: > > > > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey i saw that input modules are involved in the error trace. I > > > > > > > wonder if FOR-591 and FOR-1060 are relevant. > > > > > > > > > > > > Need to have a look into this issues and the stack. My project will > > > > > > be > > > > > > online next week I will need to find time to have a look. > > > > > > > > > > Ralph Goers recently did a lot of work at Cocoon to fix the input > > > > > modules > > > > > memory issues and instead created a more versatile system. See > > > > > FOR-1060. > > > > > > > > > > Could Forrest use that independently > > > > > > > > In theory yes, not had looked deep enough into the diff of > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1574 > > > > > > I actually meant his new XPathXMLFileModule mentioned at the > > > end of COCOON-1574. > > > > > > However, looking at the Stack trace that you attached > > > to this FOR-1066, i don't see input modules mentioned. > > > So perhaps i was mistaken. Sorry for the noise. > > > > See my other mail, the attached stack may be different from the one you > > saw. One would need to attach a stack without the profiler activated. > > You are correct, i should have gone to the extra effort > to show the actual errors. Input modules are mentioned. > Added output to FOR-1066. > > -David
Thanks. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
