On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Thorsten Scherler <thors...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 25/05/2010, at 03:15, Tim Williams wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Thorsten Scherler <thors...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 27/04/2010, at 08:04, David Crossley wrote: >>> >>>> Tim Williams wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, if the dispatcher is all that changed in such a release, we >>>>> could do a 0.91 afterwards. I think there's another consideration >>>>> that I didn't mention too. I feel irresponsible releasing software >>>>> that we can't support and I'm concerned that this would be the case >>>>> with the dispatcher. I have a difficult enough time now digging up >>>>> Cocoon knowledge when questions come across but with >>>>> dispatcher-related ones I have no clue. Maybe it's an unfounded >>>>> concern, I dunno... >>>> >>>> I have the same concerns. >>>> >>>> Perhaps we should get 0.9 released ASAP, >>>> then make a concerted effort to build a Dispatcher >>>> community. Make another release soon after. >>> >>> >>> I understand what you are all saying, but the dispatcher is basically one >>> transformer and >>> the usage of locationmap for resolving the structurer and contracts. There >>> is not much >>> more to it. >> >> So, would you be against a 0.9 release with dispatcher in the >> whiteboard? Does anyone have the time in the near future to move it >> from the whiteboard anyway? > > > I am not sure about the community support as reason to keep it in the > whiteboard. There are many devs and committer > that uses the dispatcher so I do not see the missing community around it.
Thanks Thorsten, fair enough, I'm hoping someone finds time to move it to /plugins soon? I've been avoiding the dispatcher related 0.9 issues until this decision was made so we'll also need to start picking through those issues and figuring which can be pushed off. --tim
