For a point of comparison, the python jinja2 template engine (widely used) has an "include" directive that has an attribute named "ignore missing" [1]. I also remember seeing similar behavior in other engines.
So I guess perhaps from a usability point of view this seems to be a desired feature by users. However, I don't know what the impact in terms of complexity would reflect in the code base. http://jinja.pocoo.org/docs/2.10/templates/#list-of-global-functions On Feb 17, 2018 11:18 AM, "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Some more opinions guys? Especially as we got one opinion against the > > feature. > > > > Just to clarify my opinion: I am not against this feature; I simply don't > consider it a must since there are some workaround to get a similar > behavior. But if it will be implemented I will be happy too. > > Jacopo >
