I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty much all contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we might as well make it easier for us to manage things in github.
-Dan On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git (for > Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words, after I > commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in the > GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour. > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > > some time. > > > > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > > repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > > have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > > > Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > > but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > > you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > > have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > >
