+1 On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > will this allow us to choose reviewers while creating PRs on github now? > > Regards > Nabarun > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > >> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 for Gitbox > > >> > > >> I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see > when > > a > > >> good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox > > >> project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it > > might > > >> be ready now as INFRA has begun moving some of their repositories to > > >> GitHub. We still need to 'apply' by submitting a ticket to INFRA and > > wait > > >> for approval, INFRA could still deny the move. > > >> > > >> Advantages: > > >> - GitHub PRs are fully functional (something which stopped us earlier) > > >> - Provides ability to align committer and non-committer workflows > > >> - Removing mirror from Git at Apache to GitHub and thus removing delay > > in > > >> sync > > >> > > >> Disadvantages: > > >> - Permission mapping is configured on id.apache.org (need to set > > GitHub ID) > > >> > > >> I can't think of many disadvantages to moving to GitBox. > > >> > > >> --Mark > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty > much > > all > > >>> contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we > > might as > > >>> well make it easier for us to manage things in github. > > >>> > > >>> -Dan > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git > > (for > > >>>> Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words, > > after I > > >>>> commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in > > the > > >>>> GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > > ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > > >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > > >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > > >>>>> some time. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > > >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > > >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > > >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > > >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > > >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Roman. > > >>>>> > > > > >
