+1 On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM Ken Howe <kh...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 Yes, let’s make the move > > > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>>> On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox > >>>> > >>>> On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > >>>>> some time. > >>>>> > >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W > >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently > >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf > >>>>> > >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much, > >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once > >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't > >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Roman. > >>>> > >>>> Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we > >>>> ready to convert the other repos? > >>>> > >>>> - geode > >>>> - geode-site > >>>> - geode-examples > >>>> > >>>> I think we should. > >>>> > >>>> Anthony > >>> > >> > >
