> On Jan 25, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Anilkumar Gingade <aging...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Jake, > > Interesting...Its the argument passed to function that is in deserialized > form, right?
Yes, if pdx read serialized is false (default) the argument is deserialized to domain object or fails if no domain object found. If read serialized is true then all arguments that are PDX serialized and passed in as PdxInstance. Sett my this flag breaks all previous deployed functions that expected domain objects in the argument. -Jake > > -Anil. > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> Anil, this wouldn't fix a function execution where a parameter sent to the >> function is a PDX serialized object. The function would be invoked on the >> server with the current global setting and file to deserialize the PDX to >> domain object. This is why the ask is for it to fall back to PdxInstance if >> the domain object is not deployed. >> >> -Jake >> >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:56 AM Anilkumar Gingade <aging...@pivotal.io> >> wrote: >> >>> Internally, there is an option to override read-serialized flag (to >> true); >>> the query engine and other components uses this to keep the data in >>> serialized form and work with PdxInstance... >>> >>> public static void setPdxReadSerialized(Cache cache, boolean >>> readSerialized); >>> >>> We had discussed, making this as a public api...so that any thread that >> can >>> work on PdxInstance can take advantage of it... >>> >>> -Anil. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Bruce, the flag only applies to values serialized with PDX, >>>> DataSerializable objects are not effected by this property. >>>> >>>> I think there is some real value here as a stop gap until we have a >>> better >>>> solution in Geode 2 where the user can have a per request context that >>>> specifies what return type they would like. Consider the user that has >> an >>>> existing application that uses domain objects but wants to deploy >> another >>>> application that doesn't to the same Geode cluster. The only option is >> to >>>> either have all PDX deserialize to domain objects or all returned as >>>> PdxInstance. One of the two applications will not work without >>>> modification. Changing the behavior described by Addison splits the >>>> difference. If the application is, like it is by default, configure to >>>> deserialize PDX to the domain object but the domain object is not >>> deployed >>>> it will now give back the PDX instance rather than failing. >>>> >>>> An explicit use case is user that has both a Java and .NET application. >>> The >>>> .NET application does not have any Java domain objects to deploy to the >>>> server but does want to query or run server side functions. The Java >>>> application has deployed the domain objects to the server and >> distributed >>>> functions are written expecting those domain objects on the server. The >>>> user would have to create Java domain objects for the .NET application >> or >>>> modify their Java application to expect PdxInstance. >>>> >>>> >>>> -Jake >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:38 AM Bruce Schuchardt < >> bschucha...@apache.org >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I've found the current read-serialized property to be pretty useless. >>>>> >>>>> Having said that, what if the value isn't actually in serialized form >>> in >>>>> the local cache? Is Geode supposed to serialize it & return it? >> What >>>>> if it isn't PDX-serialized? Do we return a byte array? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/24/18 12:21 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>>>>> Is this really just a workaround for the fact that the >>> read-serialized >>>>> flag >>>>>> applies to the whole cache? I can see that if you have mix of >> regions >>>>> with >>>>>> and without domain classes on the server you might want this >> feature. >>>> Can >>>>>> you provide some more background on your use case? >>>>>> >>>>>> IMO we should get rid of read-serialized in favor of APIs that let >>> the >>>>> user >>>>>> decide whether they get a domain class or a PdxInstance. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Galen O'Sullivan < >>>> gosulli...@pivotal.io >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Addison, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What kind of setup do you have that is causing you to have PDX >>>>> serialized >>>>>>> objects that cannot be deserialized? Do you have classes that are >>>>> present >>>>>>> on some servers but not others? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This change would break the contract of region.get() , which is >> that >>>> it >>>>>>> returns a value of a type that can be put into the region. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Returning something that isn't what the user is expecting to be in >>> the >>>>>>> region would require users to check for PdxInstances every time >> they >>>>> get a >>>>>>> value -- even though the type annotations say that you can't get a >>>>>>> PdxInstance back (except for Region<Object,Object> ). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be better to have a second API that allows users >> to >>>> get >>>>>>> and put PdxInstance objects in regions. That way, if they want to >>>> handle >>>>>>> the exceptional case where they have a serialized object that >> can't >>> be >>>>>>> deserialized, they can catch the ClassNotFound exception and get >> the >>>>>>> underlying PdxInstance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do think that the possibility of a ClassNotFoundException should >>> be >>>>>>> documented in the Region API. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Galen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Addison Huddy <ahu...@pivotal.io >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Geode Devs, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm proposing the following change to how we handle >> deserialization >>>>> when >>>>>>>> Domain Objects can't be found and pdx-serialize=false. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4367 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking forward to the discussion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> \ah >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
