I will be rebasing the release branch with develop, to bring in all the
improvements/ enhancements that went in in the past few months.

I am waiting on the tickets mentioned in this thread to be closed to start
on  a fresh release branch.

Regards
Nabarun Nag

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM Jens Deppe <jde...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> 5619 is marked as resolved now.
>
> Is the Release Manager planning to pick these onto 1.7 or should each
> person do their own?
>
> --Jens
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52 AM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > To summarize where we are right now in this discussion, I see the
> following
> > tickets listed in this thread as want-to-haves for 1.7:
> >
> >    - GEODE-5615 - ✅ resolved
> >    - GEODE-5601 - 🏃‍♀️ in progress
> >    - GEODE-5594 - 🏃‍♀️ waiting for PR review
> >    - GEODE-5338 - 🏃‍♀️ waiting for PR review
> >    - GEODE-5619 - 🙄 in progress in JIRA but has merged PR. What does it
> >    mean?
> >
> > Is there anything else that needs to go into 1.7?
> >
> > It seems like the best we all can do is to review Sai's PRs. Is that
> > correct?
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Jens Deppe <jde...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd also like to include GEODE-5619
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:59 PM Xiaojian Zhou <gz...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > The release will be a great one with so many historical bugs fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Today I tried to use IJ to build and run with latest build.gradle and
> > > > recent moved test packages, it worked. So this refactoring is also
> > > success.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I most definitely agree!
> > > > >
> > > > > Anthony
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 21, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we do want to wait for GEODE-5615 (DistributedTest OOMEs)
> > and
> > > > > > GEODE-5601 (AcceptanceTest port conflicts) to be fixed before
> > cutting
> > > > the
> > > > > > new 1.7 branch. It would be better if we don't create a release
> > > branch
> > > > > from
> > > > > > a point where we have these systematic issues with our pipeline.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Dan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to