+1 to deleting. Given we tag everything properly on the other branches, I don't see the need for it either.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes <alberto.bustamante.re...@est.tech> wrote: > +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about > branching that Alberto pointed out. > ________________________________ > De: Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com> > Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37 > Para: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> > Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch > > Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repos as well. > > On 6/26/20, 8:05 AM, "Blake Bender" <bbl...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Apologies if this has been addressed already and I missed it. In > keeping with other OSS projects, I believe it’s time we did something about > removing the insensitive term master from Geode repositories. > > One choice a lot of projects appear to be going with is a simple > rename from master • main. In our own case, however, master isn’t really > in use for anything vital. We track releases with a tag and a branch to > backport fixes to, and the develop branch is the “source of truth” > latest-and-greatest version of the code. We could thus simply delete > master with no loss I’m aware of. Any opinions? > > Thanks, > > Blake > > >
