+1 to delete. No good reason to keep it that I know of. I think I am the third +1 with no -1s so just do it.
Thanks, Mark > On Jun 26, 2020, at 9:13 AM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 to deleting. Given we tag everything properly on the other branches, I > don't see the need for it either. > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes > <alberto.bustamante.re...@est.tech> wrote: > >> +1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about >> branching that Alberto pointed out. >> ________________________________ >> De: Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com> >> Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37 >> Para: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> >> Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch >> >> Let's just delete it. I need to do that in my own repos as well. >> >> On 6/26/20, 8:05 AM, "Blake Bender" <bbl...@vmware.com> wrote: >> >> Apologies if this has been addressed already and I missed it. In >> keeping with other OSS projects, I believe it’s time we did something about >> removing the insensitive term master from Geode repositories. >> >> One choice a lot of projects appear to be going with is a simple >> rename from master • main. In our own case, however, master isn’t really >> in use for anything vital. We track releases with a tag and a branch to >> backport fixes to, and the develop branch is the “source of truth” >> latest-and-greatest version of the code. We could thus simply delete >> master with no loss I’m aware of. Any opinions? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Blake >> >> >>
