Sounds good to me. One question though: is it likely that the ClassLoaderService configuration will need to be persisted at all? For example, would it be reasonable to provide a user with the ability to specify a new ClassLoaderService implementation to be used upon cluster restart (via GFSH or REST), which would require some sort of persisted configuration? If this is likely, will the currently proposed implementation provide this functionality, or will that be left for future work? I only ask because I'm not sure how easy it is to convert something into a persistent service vs creating it as one in the first place. If it's trivial, then no worries. ________________________________ From: Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@vmware.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:42 AM To: geode <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: [Discussion] - ClassLoaderService RFC proposal
Hi there Apache Geode Devs, (try 2) Please find attached a proposal for a ClassLoaderService. Please review and ponder on it. https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FGEODE%2FIntroduction%2Bof%2BClassLoaderService%2Binto%2BGeode&data=02%7C01%7Cdoevans%40vmware.com%7C7cf5b252f85a4deb173f08d8589ae792%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637356769617910090&sdata=lDloqR55FH9dkUD9cyboujDkf8GjUdrAqdCzSpB8QCA%3D&reserved=0 All comments are please to be made in this mail thread. —Udo
