Should Mak (Makarand) be part of this list? On Jun 9, 2015 10:51 PM, "Anthony Baker" <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. > > Anthony > > > On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks > >> when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing > >> controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. > >> They are all currently working on the project and > >> contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have > >> as much a claim in being a project committer as > >> all the other folks who were on the proposal. > >> > >> I propose that we add them to the project as committers > >> since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: > >> * Chloe Jackson > >> * Manuel David > >> * Rajesh Kumar > >> * Rishitesh Mishra > >> * Shankar Hundekar > >> > >> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus > >> applies. > >> > > > > No objection to adding them. > > > > I'm concerned that we begin differentiating them from PPMC members, > > especially > > as we start adding non-Pivotal creators to the committer roster. > Diversity > > in the > > project is already an important issue, and segregating PPMC from > committers > > is probably premature. > > > > I'd support this list for commit if it were accompanied by nominations to > > PPMC, > > the same for all other prospective committers. The time to identify PMC > vs. > > Committers would come at the end of graduation, as podling contributors > > are identified and carried over, and those who choose to be inactive are > > dropped, at least for the time being, from the final PMC. > >
