On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi! > > for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks > when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing > controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. > They are all currently working on the project and > contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have > as much a claim in being a project committer as > all the other folks who were on the proposal. > > I propose that we add them to the project as committers > since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: > * Chloe Jackson > * Manuel David > * Rajesh Kumar > * Rishitesh Mishra > * Shankar Hundekar > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus > applies. > No objection to adding them. I'm concerned that we begin differentiating them from PPMC members, especially as we start adding non-Pivotal creators to the committer roster. Diversity in the project is already an important issue, and segregating PPMC from committers is probably premature. I'd support this list for commit if it were accompanied by nominations to PPMC, the same for all other prospective committers. The time to identify PMC vs. Committers would come at the end of graduation, as podling contributors are identified and carried over, and those who choose to be inactive are dropped, at least for the time being, from the final PMC.
