On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Anilkumar Gingade <aging...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Agree...And thats the point...The connector code needs to catch up with > spark release train; if its part of Geode then the Geode releases needs to > happen as often as Spark release (along with other planned Geode release)...
I don't think this is a realistic goal to have that many actively supported branches of Geode Spark connector. Look, I've been around Hadoop ecosystem for years. Nowhere the problem of integration with upstream is as present as in Hadoop ecosystem (everything depends on everything else and everything evolves like crazy). I haven't seen a single project in that ecosystem that would be able to support a blanket statement like the above. May be Geode has resources that guys depending on something like HBase simply don't have. Thanks, Roman.
