----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36408/#review91374 -----------------------------------------------------------
gemfire-spark-connector/project/Dependencies.scala (line 9) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36408/#comment144743> From my understanding, I think the long term plan is to no longer use a repo and instead rely on the spark gemfire connector being built within the geode build. Then add a dependency on the geode jar file from the build artifacts. Then the instructions about building and such would be unnecessary. The Integration tests would be modified to not use a GEODE location and instead just use the build artifacts as well. I think we should make the leap to this new model unless it's necessary for this intermediate step... - Jason Huynh On July 10, 2015, 11:32 p.m., Jianxia Chen wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/36408/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 10, 2015, 11:32 p.m.) > > > Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Bruce Schuchardt, Jason Huynh, > and Qihong Chen. > > > Repository: geode > > > Description > ------- > > Remove the dependency on Pivotal's internal repo. > > Resolve the conflict of different netty versions on Spark and Geode. > > To build Geode Spark Connector, first build Geode and publish the jars to > local repo. Then you build the connector using sbt. > > > Diffs > ----- > > gemfire-spark-connector/doc/1_building.md ece4a9c > gemfire-spark-connector/project/Dependencies.scala 899e182 > gemfire-spark-connector/project/Settings.scala ec61884 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36408/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > sbt test it:test > > > Thanks, > > Jianxia Chen > >
