> On Aug. 12, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java,
> >  line 49
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/1/?file=1471613#file1471613line49>
> >
> >     This could probably extend ExternalResource rather than directly 
> > implementing TestRule.

Changed to extend ExternalResource.


> On Aug. 12, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java,
> >  line 99
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/1/?file=1471613#file1471613line99>
> >
> >     I'm not sure getLocatorVM is the right thing to call this. It's not 
> > really getting the locator, it's actually configuring the locator. I 
> > suspect many tests you might not actually need to get the locator VM.
> >     
> >     Could the Rule just set this stuff up before the test runs, I wonder?

The idea here is to create cluster (locator, and nodes) using the given/custom 
properties...This simplifies setting up a cluster for those tests...We could 
change the Rule name appropriately, i could not come up with a better name....

There could be requirement for a test where it needs a vm configured with 
specified properties...We could add one more Rule that can do that...


> On Aug. 12, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java,
> >  line 113
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/1/?file=1471613#file1471613line113>
> >
> >     What if someone calls getVM instead of getNodeVM? I wonder if it would 
> > be possible to make this work so that someone doesn't need to call 
> > getNodeVM?

One could call getVm and configure it as they want (create a new DS)...And join 
the cluster using the locator port from the Locator configured in Rule.


> On Aug. 12, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java,
> >  line 122
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/1/?file=1471613#file1471613line122>
> >
> >     Use port 0 instead to avoid potential races. You can get the port back 
> > from the locator after it starts. See DUnitLauncher.startLocator.

Done.


> On Aug. 12, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java,
> >  line 129
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/1/?file=1471613#file1471613line129>
> >
> >     This could be a lambda: locator.invoke(() -> {...})

Done.


- anilkumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/#review145629
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 11, 2016, 10:34 p.m., anilkumar gingade wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2016, 10:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, Jason Huynh, Kirk 
> Lund, William Markito, nabarun nag, Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added test to validate Cluster configuration support for Lucene indexes.
> 
> Added a new Rule to create Distributed System with test/custom 
> configuration...The "LocatorServerConfigurationRule" makes it easier to 
> create a Locator or cluster nodes with required configuration.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/test/dunit/rules/LocatorServerConfigurationRule.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/configuration/LuceneClusterConfigurationDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51010/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run the newly added test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> anilkumar gingade
> 
>

Reply via email to