Hi everyone, We completed the M3 release in August and now we should consider the scope for the next release: 1.0.0-incubating. We’ve had previous discussions on this topic [1] but I would like us to reopen the conversation and make sure we are all still in agreement. In particular, I think we are getting pretty close to being ready for graduation [2] with one exception: we need to rename our source packages to ‘org.apache.geode’ [3].
I think we should move forward with package renaming *now* and include that in the scope for the 1.0.0-incubating release. As previously discussed [4] we’d like to preserve protocol compatibility for existing users of client/server and WAN. This should only affect a handful of classes that would remain in the ‘com.gemstone.gemfire’ namespace (we should identify those soon). Thoughts? What else belongs in 1.0.0-incubating? Anthony [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201604.mbox/%3cCAFh+7k1nMh8muFDs7NuXzj7q3mBy9NrJeC0jMA=hqxE=eaf...@mail.gmail.com%3e [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Maturity+Level [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-37 [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccaezsiboumfdmqa8x29gzuteb_6jv9tbdlhczyxhfsbbxmaq...@mail.gmail.com%3e
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
