++1 to finally do it! This is great! We should include not only Spring Data Geode but also Apache Zeppelin, Apache Apex...
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We completed the M3 release in August and now we should consider the scope > for the next release: 1.0.0-incubating. We’ve had previous discussions on > this topic [1] but I would like us to reopen the conversation and make sure > we are all still in agreement. In particular, I think we are getting > pretty close to being ready for graduation [2] with one exception: we need > to rename our source packages to ‘org.apache.geode’ [3]. > > I think we should move forward with package renaming *now* and include > that in the scope for the 1.0.0-incubating release. > > As previously discussed [4] we’d like to preserve protocol compatibility > for existing users of client/server and WAN. This should only affect a > handful of classes that would remain in the ‘com.gemstone.gemfire’ > namespace (we should identify those soon). > > Thoughts? What else belongs in 1.0.0-incubating? > > Anthony > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201604. > mbox/%3cCAFh+7k1nMh8muFDs7NuXzj7q3mBy9NrJeC0jMA=hqxE=EAfWxw@mail.gmail. > com%3e > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Maturity+Level > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-37 > [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode- > dev/201509.mbox/%3cCAEzsiBOUmfdmQA8X29gzUTeB_6jV9tbDLHCZYXhFSbBXmaQQAw@ > mail.gmail.com%3e > -- ~/William
