Bumping this. Any thoughts? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is > essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully > baked and we don't support it". > Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0? > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, > because > > it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more > > complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the > should > > try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for > > people to get jVSD and play with it. > > > > -Dan > > >
