I would recommend not mentioning jVSD at all in the Geode 1.0 docs. Right now it's just a Jira ticket and feature branch. I think the docs should only cover what's in Geode 1.0.
If there's some doc or wiki page about proposed future features or features currently looking for contributors/developers, then that would probably be an appropriate place to mention jVSD. Thanks, Kirk On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Bumping this. Any thoughts? > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup > is > > essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully > > baked and we don't support it". > > Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0? > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, > > because > > > it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more > > > complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the > > should > > > try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for > > > people to get jVSD and play with it. > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > >
