Also take a look at the Incubator graduation guide[1] - especially the
section on Community. That section includes the following, but as I said in
June[2] the IPMC seems to have moved from the prescriptive criteria laid
out in that section, but would be a good idea to consult either with
mentors or on general@incubator about whether geode has more work to do in
this area:

"The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not
highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at least 3 legally
independent committers and there is no single company or entity that is
vital to the success of the project). Basically this means that when a
project mostly consists of contributors from one company, this is a sign of
not being diverse enough. You can mitigate this requirement by admitting
more external contributors to your project that have no tie to the single
entity."

The other issue are the geode docs which are hosted on a pivotal site
rather than on geodes website here at apache[3]. Whats the plan for
bringing the docs here?

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
[2] http://markmail.org/message/7qkbdjsrddtp6q7y
[3] http://markmail.org/message/fh4azdjqfhkdugpn

Niall

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Hi Dor,
>
> Take a look at the maturity assessment for geode:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+
> Assessment
>
> Several of the project mentors have provided feedback that the project is
> headed in the right direction and nearly ready for a graduation
> discussion.  We are working to complete package renaming (GEODE-37) which
> is a prerequisite for this.
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Dor Ben Dov <dor.ben-...@amdocs.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wondered if there is a plan or according to what it will be decided by
> the ASF to convert Apache Geode into TLP from Incubation?
> >
> > When do you expect it will happen ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dor Ben Dov
> >
> > This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> > you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
>
>

Reply via email to