I think we should ship the pdf docs. Geode shouldn't point to Pivotal for its docs.
-- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Oct 17, 2016 9:53 PM, "William Markito" <wmark...@pivotal.io> wrote: > IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. > > About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that > module, that would be cool as well. > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary > release? > > Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with > 1.0.RC2 > > points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ . > > > > What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? > > > > -Dan > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io > > > > wrote: > > > > > @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community > time > > > to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William > > > Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the > website > > > with the docs included. > > > > > > Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push the current docs > to > > > the website. I'll also document the process in a README. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM Roman Shaposhnik < > ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, > > let’s > > > > start > > > > > hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and > start > > > > maintaining > > > > it a'la Hadoop: > > > > https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/ > > > > ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~/William >
