Perhaps longer term we should consider moving the docs to Asciidoc It is relatively simple matter to convert Asciidoc to PDF.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Sadly just looked at the license for wkhtmltopdf and it uses GPL 3.0. I > believe that would be an issue as discussed here <https://www.apache.org/ > licenses/GPL-compatibility.html>. > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > In the past I have used wkhtmltopdf to build programmatically PDFs from > HTML documents. We could try using this to generate a PDF version of the > docs in the interim until we can generate a PDF directly from book binder. > > > >> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> > >> Its really important to ship pdf docs because its very difficult to > search > >> otherwise. > >> > >> -- > >> Mike Stolz > >> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager > >> Mobile: 631-835-4771 > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Joey McAllister < > jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> @Dan: I didn't realize there was a docs link in the top-level README. > We > >>> can change that for the next release, and I can look into redirecting > >>> geode.docs.pivotal.io to geode.incubator.apache.org/docs/ in the > meantime, > >>> once the docs are posted there.. > >>> > >>> @William: We don't currently have a PDF for these docs. I'm researching > >>> options. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:53 PM William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> IHMO, it would be really nice to ship a PDF version of the docs. > >>> > >>> About the examples, if we could package and ship sources only for that > >>> module, that would be cool as well. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary > >>> release? > >>>> Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with > >>> 1.0.RC2 > >>>> points to http://geode.docs.pivotal.io/ . > >>>> > >>>> What about geode-examples? Should that be part of the binary release? > >>>> > >>>> -Dan > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joey McAllister < > jmcallis...@pivotal.io > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community > >>> time > >>>>> to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). > William > >>>>> Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the > >>> website > >>>>> with the docs included. > >>>>> > >>>>> Based on the +1s here, I'd like to go ahead and push the current docs > >>> to > >>>>> the website. I'll also document the process in a README. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:49 PM Roman Shaposhnik < > >>> ro...@shaposhnik.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Since the geode docs have now been merged to the develop branch, > >>>> let’s > >>>>>> start > >>>>>>> hosting them on http://geode.apache.org. Thoughts? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Huge +1! Anything stopping you from pushing the first update and > >>> start > >>>>>> maintaining > >>>>>> it a'la Hadoop: > >>>>>> https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/ > >>>>>> ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Roman. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> ~/William > >>> > > > > -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
