+1 Shouldn't that be org.apache.geode.security.examples?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for both renaming it now and moving it to a separate module going > forward. > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > We have some example code that's not in geode-examples. > > geode-core-1.0.0-incubating.jar currently contains this package with > > examples: > > > > org.geode.gemfire.security.templates > > > > Given that template means something a bit different from example, I'd > like > > to rename this package to examples. Is this acceptable? > > > > Going forward, this community needs to spend some considerable effort in > > improving modularity of geode. The geode-core module should contain only > > the bare essentials that are always necessary when using geode. Optional > > features and the like should move to their own modules. Along the same > line > > of thought, examples should move to geode-examples or some similar > > sub-module (or even a separate repo). That sub-module should generate a > jar > > that can be added to the classpath for purposes of demoing or trying out > > geode (kicking the tires). I'd like the community to come up with > > additional ideas on how to facilitate demoing and also make it easier in > > general to try out geode for the first time. > > > > -Kirk > > > > > > -- > Cheers > > Jinmei >
