+1 On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:22 AM Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Yep! Replace "gemfire" with "geode" > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Kevin Duling <kdul...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Shouldn't that be org.apache.geode.security.examples? > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for both renaming it now and moving it to a separate module going > > > > forward. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > We have some example code that's not in geode-examples. > > > > > geode-core-1.0.0-incubating.jar currently contains this package > with > > > > > examples: > > > > > > > > > > org.geode.gemfire.security.templates > > > > > > > > > > Given that template means something a bit different from example, > I'd > > > > like > > > > > to rename this package to examples. Is this acceptable? > > > > > > > > > > Going forward, this community needs to spend some considerable > effort > > > in > > > > > improving modularity of geode. The geode-core module should contain > > > only > > > > > the bare essentials that are always necessary when using geode. > > > Optional > > > > > features and the like should move to their own modules. Along the > > same > > > > line > > > > > of thought, examples should move to geode-examples or some similar > > > > > sub-module (or even a separate repo). That sub-module should > > generate a > > > > jar > > > > > that can be added to the classpath for purposes of demoing or > trying > > > out > > > > > geode (kicking the tires). I'd like the community to come up with > > > > > additional ideas on how to facilitate demoing and also make it > easier > > > in > > > > > general to try out geode for the first time. > > > > > > > > > > -Kirk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Jinmei > > > > > > > > > >
