Hi, Sorry for coming late in this discussion. Currently, we have two equivalent approaches in order to create widgets: GXP and UX. I would appreciate if we could agree on one approach so that we can share developments. So, which path should we follow for GeoExt2 extensions ? Thanks for any input. Cédric
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Phil Scadden <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28/07/2012 6:21 a.m., Alexandre Dubé wrote: > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the UX for GeoExt2 as I > > would like to work on the unofficial GeoExt.ux.LayerTreeBuilder (still > > in a sandbox, only) for GeoExt2. > Alexandre - converting your ux on this is the only thing standing > between us moving to geoext2! I am delighted you are working on it. I > was starting to looking resources on migrating it. Got a list of > suggestions on improvement too once that is done :-) ! I think this > extension is just fantastic - the main reason to use Geoext. > > > Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential. If received in > error please destroy and immediately notify us. Do not copy or disclose the > contents. > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- Political blog: http://cedricmoullet.blogspot.com/ Welcome to my world: http://www.cedricmoullet.com/ My Linked In profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cedricmoullet Twitter: http://twitter.com/cedricmoullet Home sweet home: http://map.geo.admin.ch/?crosshair=bowl&zoom=11&X=185241.24219&Y=561288.90625&bgOpacity=0&selectedNode=node_ch.swisstopo.fixpunkte-lage1
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
