On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, David Jencks wrote:
> IMO the m4 uberbuild should work with m4 artifacts only, not ones
> intended for head. Either that or it should be removed, which IMO will
> cause worse confusion.
I was actually talking about the HEAD uberbuild. Sorry.
Aaron
> On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > Shall we remove TranQL from the uberbuild, or switch the
> > uberbuild to use the TranQL 1.0 branch? It's a little annoying
> > that a clean uberbuild builds TranQL 1.1 and so you can't do an offline
> > m:rebuild-all (since it therefore wants to download TranQL 1.0).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >> tranql-1.0-20050713 has been posted to dist.codehaus.org
> >>
> >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>> Can we get a non-snapshot release of that, maybe
> >>>
> >>> tranql-1.0-M4-20050711.jar
> >>>
> >>> to remove one more snapshot?
> >>>
> >>> geir
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I have created a new branch in TranQL for work leading up to the
> >>>> 1.0
> >>>> release; the name in CVS is "branch-1_0" and to check out use
> >>>>
> >>>> cvs co -r branch-1_0 tranql
> >>>>
> >>>> This branch is intended for bug fixes only, new features &
> >>>> enhancements should continue to go into HEAD.
> >>>>
> >>>> The project.xml has been updated so that
> >>>> HEAD will generate tranql-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
> >>>> branch-1_0 will generate tranql-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jeremy
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
