On Jul 20, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 12:01 PM, David Jencks wrote:
well,
-1000
I feel pretty strongly about this too. Obviously its better to fix
stuff in all branches at once, but it won't always be possible,
especially after 1.3 diverges from 1.0, 2.4 vs 1.1, 5.6 vs 2.1 etc.
At some point you have to say that there are different issues in
different branches, even though the symptom is the same. I think the
jira guys know of what they speak when the recommend using multiple
entries.
Good point. How about we only split an issue when we fix it in one
branch and not the others? I would suspect that this will be a rare
event... at lest for a the next few years :)
+10 (moderating my overenthusiasm :-)
I'm even willing to publicly support giving people a couple days
latitude between branch fixes before thinking another linked issue is
essential.
david jencks
-dain
