So our our naming schema, when dealing with web services, has an unfortunate overlap with two different "port" elements that are subtlely different:
<service-ref> <service-ref-name /> <service-completion> <service-name /> <port> (def #1, portCompletionType) (contents of port #2) <binding-name /> </port> </service-completion> <port> (def #2) ... </port> </service-ref> In other words, the first "port" element contains all the same stuff as the second "port" element plus one extra element. I think it would be preferable to have what's currently the first "port" look like this: <port-completion> <port ... /> <binding-name /> </port-completion> That way both "port" elements would be identical. Any objections to making this change in M5? Thanks, Aaron