On Sep 18, 2005, at 7:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 9/18/2005 4:51 PM:
OK. I still have stuff I want to get in, but I can add it to both
M5 and HEAD.
-1 one should not be adding features to two branches.
But fixes we do... for example, I still have to get those
replacement files in place from Rick, and any fixes we do to pass CTS
must go into HEAD, or we do this all over again next time.
In the future, could we drop "QA"? You know, make it just the
"1.0-M6" branch. Again, more important once we have release we're
committed to maintain instead of replace, but I think the "QA" in
the name contributes to the confusion over whether it should be
deleted or not after the target release.
I also like the idea of droping the QA designation in the branch
name. I think that this is what was cause for confusion about the
M4 branch.
Agreed.
Regards,
Alan
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
