Hi Rick, > There is an implementation of all of the javamail api classes (including >support for multipart-MIME messages). There's very little done in terms >of protocol-specific implementation classes other than the SMTPTransport >code that was just promoted out of the sandbox.
Where can I find these classes have they been ported to the trunk from the sandbox??? I did an update now and all I see under org.apache.geronimo.mail Is a couple of GBeans for Stores, Mail and SMTP transport. As far as a JavaMail implementation is concerned I only see NullTransport.java. Can somebody help me figure out if I am looking in the wrong place? Regards, Rajith Attapattu. -----Original Message----- From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:52 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? [status] Rajith Attapattu wrote: >Bruce/ Dain, > >Can u guys please comment on this? >(below is the break down from my reading/research) > >I would like to know if this is going in release 1.0 or 1.x ?? (somebody >else asked this question too) > >Since there is a smtp transport already written I believe there is at >least a minimum implementation of the Message class. > > There is an implementation of all of the javamail api classes (including support for multipart-MIME messages). There's very little done in terms of protocol-specific implementation classes other than the SMTPTransport code that was just promoted out of the sandbox. >If so we can sub class it and provide POP3 or IMAP Message classes. > >However how work has been done on it mile MultiPart and MimePart etc..? > >Regards, > >Rajith Attapattu. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:23 AM >To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >Subject: RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? [status] > >Is anybody willing to tackle the Message (which conforms to >specifications RFC822 and RFC2045) then I can concentrate on POP3 and >Bruce on IMAP. > >Since this Message is a beast on it's own it maybe too much for one >person if the timeline is too short. > >At least if somebody can analyze and then summarize (reading the whole >thing will kill you :) ) it, then I can code the Message thingy. > >Any volunteers ??? > >Regards, > >Rajith Attapattu. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:10 AM >To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >Subject: RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? [status] > >Ok here is what I have right now for POP3. > >I have gone through the RFC 1939 in detail and here is the summary. I >have also gone through the JavaMail API spec. Started a bit if coding. > >I can come with a basic POP3 implementation that connects, authenticates >and list/retrieve/delete messages by Tuesday the earliest. > >Next on my list is message processing according to RFC 822. > >After that I will look into authentication. > >Is this timeline OK???? > >POP3 protocol stack >===================== >I will start ASAP on the connection management and the mandatory POP3 >commands. > USER name valid in the AUTHORIZATION state > PASS string > QUIT > > STAT valid in the TRANSACTION state > LIST [msg] > RETR msg > DELE msg > NOOP > RSET > QUIT > > >Authentication >=============== >For now I will only work on USER/PASS, but some servers do not support >plain text authentication. > >However I need to find out more details about the AUTH(RFC 1734) command >which use encryption. Same thing is used for IMAP. (didn't have time to >investigate). > >Message Format (RFC 822) >======================= >A whole new beast to be conquered. Again I didn't have time to go >through in detail. Will give an update by Monday evening if possible. > >Guys, is this too much time??? What is the deadline??? do we need this >before ApacheCon ?? > >Regards, >Rajith. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 8:25 PM >To: dev@geronimo.apache.org >Subject: Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports? > >On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I guess we can later move it to it's own sub-project so other Apache >>users can use it as a standalone library. Just so that they don't go >>through the same trouble we are experiencing. >> >> > >Yes, absolutely. The goal is to offer implementations of transports >for IMAP, POP3, SMTP and maybe even Mbox and Maildir eventually. > >Bruce >-- >perl -e 'print >unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" >);' > >The Castor Project >http://www.castor.org/ > >Apache Geronimo >http://geronimo.apache.org/ > > >
