2006/1/6, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > HEAD will be 2.0 which includes JEE 5 and other significant work (Maven 2 > conversion, etc.)
Hi Matt, That's my understanding, too. > Branches/1.0 will be where the work for 1.0.x will take place. It would be > from > this code base we'd branch to a 1.1 when appropriate. +1 > I'm updating my local copy of the branches/1.0 with a version change for > Geronimo to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT as well as updating to Tomcay 5.1.15 and Jetty > 5.1.10 > to incoroporate the latent fixes. Excellent! Let us know when it's finished so we could give it a whirl, esp. those who don't follow scm. > I'll build and test to make sure its still working (I'm not going to run TCK). > and then commit these changes back when I've confirmed we're ready to go for > 1.0.1. Does this sound workable? I wouldn't have said it better ;) I think we should write it down somewhere. Any hints on where it ought to be? On another note, what do others think about creating Grinder (or another tool) scripts to validate a release? It would likely be similar to TCK, but unlike TCK anybody could run it. > Matt Jacek
